Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > Packers > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Saturday, July 12, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (28 comment(s))

Favre tells Packers to release him


.
GREEN BAY — Brett Favre indeed wants to play football again, and he's willing to do it for someone other than the Green Bay Packers - setting up what figures to be ugly parting of the ways between the legendary quarterback and the franchise he'd embodied for 16 years.

Why? Because the Packers will not - under any circumstances - honor Favre's request for an outright release, preferring instead to trade him, two NFL sources said.
ESPN reported first Friday afternoon - and the State Journal confirmed with two NFL sources - that Favre's agent, James ''Bus'' Cook, had sent the Packers a letter in which Cook requested that the Packers unconditionally release Favre. Cook overnighted the letter from Mississippi to Green Bay Thursday, and the Packers received it at 1265 Lombardi Ave. Friday.

The State Journal reported July 2 Favre's initial conversation with the Packers a few weeks earlier about a potential comeback ended in Favre asking for his release because the team wasn't receptive to him coming back. Friday's letter made that request official, although it did not force the Packers to make a decision on Favre's status.

The Packers had decided to move on in the wake of Favre reneging on plans to unretire in late March. According to two NFL sources, Favre informed the Packers during the annual NFL meetings in late March - less than a month after his tearful March 6 retirement news conference - that he wanted to play again.

The sources said, at the time, Packers coach Mike McCarthy and general manager Ted Thompson told Favre they would welcome him back, and plans were made for him to return, including chartering a plane to go to Mississippi to complete the comeback deal.

But two days before the meeting was to occur, Favre called the team to say he had changed his mind yet again and had decided he wanted to stay retired.

After yet another flip-flop by Favre, the team decided to commit fully to moving on without Favre, the sources said.

McCarthy and Thompson weren't available for comment Friday. The Packers responded by releasing a statement shortly before 4 p.m., sending a clear message the club has no intention of granting Favre's request.

''The Green Bay Packers are aware of the latest developments regarding Brett Favre. Brett earned and exercised the right to retire on his terms. We wanted him to return and welcomed him back on more than one occasion,'' the statement read. ''Brett's press conference (on March 6) and subsequent conversations in the following weeks illustrated his commitment to retirement. The finality of his decision to retire was accepted by the organization. At that point, the Green Bay Packers made the commitment to move forward with our football team.

''As a retired player, Brett has the option to apply for reinstatement with Commissioner (Roger) Goodell. If that were to occur, he would become an active member of the Green Bay Packers. As always, the Packers will do what's right and in the best interest of the team.

''As with all Packers greats, Brett's legacy will always be celebrated by our fans and the organization, regardless of any change in his personal intentions. Brett and (his wife) Deanna will always be a part of the Packers family.''

On Tuesday, Favre, Cook, Thompson and McCarthy participated in a conference call in which Favre made it clear he wants to play this season, sources confirmed. Afterward, Favre was convinced the Packers did not want him back and told Cook to move forward with the formal request for his release, one of the sources said.

Favre could have instead petitioned for reinstatement from the reserve/retired list, upon which he'd been placed by the club April 25. Had he done so, the Packers would have had 24 hours to either put him back on their 80-man roster or release him.

Instead, according to ESPN's Chris Mortensen, Cook wrote in the letter he wanted to have ''an amicable parting,'' because the Packers hadn't embraced the idea of Favre unretiring. Thus, Favre and Cook opted to ask for Favre's outright release. Mortensen was in Hattiesburg, Miss., with Favre and Cook, but both men declined comment.

NFL senior vice president of media relations Greg Aiello said via email until Favre applies for reinstatement to active status with the commissioner's office, nothing has changed in terms of his status.

''(Right now), it's a club matter,'' Aiello said. ''The club puts a player in a roster category - active, inactive, injured reserve, reserve/retired - not the player. A player designated as retired must apply for reinstatement with the commissioner's office. That is standard procedure.''

If the Packers granted Favre's request, he would be free to play for any of the league's other 31 teams, including NFC North rivals Minnesota and Chicago, both of whom could be in the market for a quarterback.

The Packers are slated to retire Favre's No. 4 at a ceremony at Lambeau Field during the Sept. 8 regular-season opener against the Vikings on ''Monday Night Football.'' The Packers report to training camp July 27, and Favre is scheduled to present his buddy, center Frank Winters, for induction into the Packers Hall of Fame July 19.

Favre has three years left on his contract, at base salaries of $12 million in 2008, $13 million in '09 and $14 million in '10.

At age 38, Favre had a renaissance season in 2007, completing a career-best 66.5 percent of his regular-season passes for 4,155 yards, 28 touchdowns and 15 interceptions for a 95.7 passer rating (his best since 1995) while leading the team with the youngest opening-day roster in the NFL to the NFC Championship Game, where the Packers lost in overtime to the Super Bowl XLII-champion New York Giants.

Following his retirement announcement, Favre publicly mused about a possible comback on several occasions this spring, and in April, the Los Angeles Times reported - and the State Journal confirmed - Cook had been quietly talking to other NFL teams to gauge their interest if Favre were to return. Cook denied it, as did Favre.

Favre also issued a semi-denial July 2 that he was mulling a comeback, sending a text message to the Biloxi (Miss.) Sun Herald that talk of him contacting the Packers about his ''itch'' to play again was ''all rumor.''
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

finally wrote on Jul 18, 2008 10:33 AM:

" To Im still Jackson......you seem to be the voice of reason and the only person on here to see it from both sides and make sense!! Wish more people had your attitude!! "

Native wrote on Jul 13, 2008 6:44 AM:

" Whats the problem? In the last 2 offseasons this is the earliest that Butt Farve has ended his talk of retirement. This is the earliest that he has committed to the team and why are they not welcoming him back to his old position. He's more familiar to the system than Rodgers, why is Rodgers getting farve's job when Farve says he wants it back? "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 12, 2008 5:16 PM:

" "obg"...he IS still the WINNINGEST QB in history... "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 12, 2008 5:13 PM:

" "quay"...oh...did he sign a contract with one if them? you sound very proud that OTHERS also are SPECULATING about multiple teams...go ahead...pick the other 29....THEN you can be right.........sad to be so proud of NOT KNOWING...but I guess if that's all you got, CONGRATULATIONS on being amongst other UKNOWING SPECULATORS...you've found your FAMILY "quay".... "

HonestAbe wrote on Jul 12, 2008 5:10 PM:

" good god, who cares!!!!!!!!

isn't 10,000,000,000 enough?

do you not like your family bretty?

are you just a media whore and miss the cameras?

how about some real answers?

I was overly happy when he retired so we didn't have to hear or read that mispronounced name anymore!! (never knew we could flip flop letters in the pronunciation of our names)

football, big waste of time,,,, dwelling on one player .... even bigger waste. "

beerman wrote on Jul 12, 2008 4:19 PM:

" Lets not retire the number 4 jersey also "

TJ2U wrote on Jul 12, 2008 2:44 PM:

" I feel bad for all of those people who spent money on all of the "special edition" magazines printed soley in honor of Brett's retirement, if he isn't actually retiring. I don't think it is fair to mislead fans and profit from it, then go somewhere else to play anyway. "

2centsworth wrote on Jul 12, 2008 2:08 PM:

" brett, your breaking packer fans hearts all over the country!! you said before you would never play for another team. You done us sooooooooooo proud, you worked your butt off, you gave us all the very best you could. now please sit back enjoy your retirement and let us all remember you as a greenbay packer for ever and ever!! we love you and thank you! "

Im Still Jackson wrote on Jul 12, 2008 1:28 PM:

" BTW I HATE football but recognize talent anywhere! Thing is they only love you when your winning or can get something from you in WI and I think hes figured that out! "

Im Still Jackson wrote on Jul 12, 2008 1:24 PM:

" Sometimes you need a little walk around time to figure out what you want. I think he's been tired of Greenbay for quite sometime and wants a change and misguided himself into retirement or possibly is manuevering through the obstacles in the way to his release. He tested the waters and got his answer Now theres just 40 million reasons left of his contract to figure it out.Sometimes you need to walk off stage and down some gravel roads to clear your head! I think hes done that and realized football is all he knows, now what? At 35 he's rich and can do anything he wants but I dont think he sees that opportunity as the forest from the trees.I wish him well where ever he goes and you Greenbay fans should too he gave ALL and then some! "

random annoying bozo wrote on Jul 12, 2008 12:58 PM:

" as ussual, 'it's all about Brett'. he showing he's just another attention starved prima donna, with a huge ego. but to some i guess slowly watching a persons skills deteriorate right in front of their eyes is entertainment. so i guess Brett will offer you the perverted entertainment you crave. "

riversguide wrote on Jul 12, 2008 12:22 PM:

" Yep let him go. This is a buisness and you cant make up your mind Brett Then tuff cookies. Enjoy playing for another team. Cant wait to see AJ Hawk sack your Butt!!! PACKER FAN FOR LIFE!!! "

wisconsingal wrote on Jul 12, 2008 11:06 AM:

" Geez, with all the flip-flopping back and forth Brett should go into politics!! I personally would love to see him play again, but I think he's making a huge mistake if he decides to do so. Wonder what his wife has to say about all of this? Is she already sick of him being at home all the time!!?? "

Cards wrote on Jul 12, 2008 10:46 AM:

" Brett Favre, awesome quarterback who is somewhat confused on what to do. He has done a great job for the Packers, and I don't like him going to another team, but Brett is for helping others, so da rotten bears and the viqueens may get him, and then they would finally have a good quarterback with class unlike the sucky bears and viqueens which have never had any class they now will have class with Brett, but they won't know how to handle class, I wish you would stay Brett but if you go to da bears or queens, that is nice you are helping them out as the giving person you are, I do feel it is a mistake to comback though.. "

Chante wrote on Jul 12, 2008 10:21 AM:

" Nothing tarnished here, the man earned the right to do what ever he chooses, and that he will. Time will tell, and by the way,our no name recievers are still good enough, otherwise we would have pawned them off on the Vikings :) "

JohnnyHobo wrote on Jul 12, 2008 10:18 AM:

" Let him go! He's put in his time in Green Bay. Someplace closer to home (New Orleans, Atlanta, Tennessee) or where he can get home quick (Chicago, Miami) are ideal for old Brett. Overall, most athletes get a "fatigue" with a certain franchise or city. Green Bay is particularly tiring as the Packers are the only thing in town. Give Brett the opportunity to have a last season or two where he doesn't have to be in the lime light 24/7. "

Eddie wrote on Jul 12, 2008 10:16 AM:

" quay, you're right about Favre stumbling through life as the rest of us do. Favre is far from perfect, just like the rest of us. However, he did not retire to make others happy. He retired because he was sick of the weekly practices and preparations, and because the loss to the Giants crushed him. He said all of this in his retirement speech. I will always praise Favre for what he did for the Packers, but I also have to say that he's not doing the right thing now. He's not taking responsibility for his constant indecision about playing/retiring. "

OBG wrote on Jul 12, 2008 10:10 AM:

" Let's be honest, Packer Fans! We should all wish ol' #4 well, and watch him throw "stupid" interceptions for another franchise. Lord know's, he killed the Pack's chances for victory on way too many occasions! "

elocs wrote on Jul 12, 2008 10:01 AM:

" Favre is like a lot of great athletes who just don't have the good sense to know when to hang it up, although very few can go out on the top as John Elway did. He had a great season last year, but that could reverse itself quickly. If he blow a knee or breaks a leg he will wish he had stayed retired. He missed out on a lot of the life of his oldest daughter and now he has the opportunity to spend some quality time with his youngest daughter before she grows up. The day will come when Favre will either retire by choice or he will be forced to do it, ending his career as a shadow of his former self. I think he may regret his decision to return, but either way his halo has been tarnished. "

Margin of Error wrote on Jul 12, 2008 9:58 AM:

" What is motivating him? Love of money,the game or fame? If decision-making with a football in his hand was as erratic, he would've been sacked every time. "

quay wrote on Jul 12, 2008 9:19 AM:

" you guys should go easy on #4..If you had paid any attention to who he was and how he plays you would have known that he was not done. He retired to make others happy. Who hasn't done that in their like.? Just because he can throw a football hard doesn't mean he has life all figured out. He stumbles around like the rest of us.

Hey PA, did you see two of my 10 pecent of picks was mentioned in the article? You are the math wiz, what kind of percentage correct is
that? "

Eddie wrote on Jul 12, 2008 9:04 AM:

" Brett Favre retired tearfully on March 6th. He completely refuted all the rumors about Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy not wanting him back. Then, in late March, Favre wanted to unretire. Thompson and McCarthy welcomed him back. They even flew down to Mississippi to finalize the deal. BUT, Favre changed his mind AGAIN, and stayed retired. Thompson and McCarthy then did the right thing - they committed to Aaron Rodgers. Now, Favre has changed his mind YET AGAIN. Sorry, Brett, but you just can't keep doing this. You also can't recapture the magic by going to another team. It will be a disaster if you do! DON'T DO IT!! "

Eddie wrote on Jul 12, 2008 9:00 AM:

" Brett Favre's legendary status with the Packers will never change, but he is dropping the ball on this matter. He has gone back on every thing that he said and did regarding his retirement, and those close to him are trying to (falsely) blame Ted Thompson for it. The Packers have every right to not release Favre. They have to do what is best for the TEAM, so they will either keep Favre retired or trade him. I hope that Favre wakes up and sees what he is doing.....and stays retired. "

BrianGSmith wrote on Jul 12, 2008 8:52 AM:

" Dear "mmercier43@charter.net"....Favre is 38, you are 7 years off and last year was statistically one of his and the Packer's best years. Favre and every other pro player should play their pro games for as long as they can. SO bug off. Favre is still productive and has alot of intangibles. Alot of teams would be very interested in having Favre. (I'm not a Pack-fan) "

Just Some Dude wrote on Jul 12, 2008 8:48 AM:

" He totally slapped you guys in the face.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

We would welcome him to Minnesota with open arems.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Now you get to see how pitiful your no name recievers really are.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA "

mmercier43@charter.net wrote on Jul 12, 2008 8:27 AM:

" well all I have to say is who is dumb enough to take him good luck. Let's hope he breaks more records with that team like that interceptions.

bret wake up do you actually think there is any team out there that needs a
45-year-old quarterback. Why don't you just grab your golf clubs and try to get as good as John Elway did,I really don't think he is going to be a threat in the NFL ever again. "

cataractjack wrote on Jul 12, 2008 8:14 AM:

" trade this guy to the AFC. I have no problem with that. That is it. No NFC team. Favre is an idiot coming back. 2005 he was the worst QB in the league. Greenbay last year was a great team overall. He is selfish, could care less about the pack. He has jerked us around since he threated to retire if TT fired Sherman against his wishes. You tell him to come to camp and we will see what we can do as far as a trade. If they release him it would be the dumbest thing in the history of the NFL "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 12, 2008 1:25 AM:

" ah...WHAT A TWISTED WEB...WHO IS DECEIVING...WHO IS UP FRONT? THIS JUST GOT INTERESTING...... "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.