Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Sunday, May 11, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (18 comment(s))

West Salem considers charging for fire calls


.
WEST SALEM, Wis. — The West Salem Fire Protection District is considering charging for fire calls if equipment costs become a problem.

WSFPD Board President Reuben Oldenburg said while he doesn’t foresee the board starting a user fee, it is among the options discussed as the agency looks at ways to pay for firefighter equipment and a new tanker truck.
“This particular user fee is just a thought if we don’t have enough money, but I certainly hope that won’t come to pass,” Oldenburg said.

The La Crosse Fire Department has never considered charging a fee for fire calls and doesn’t expect to in near future, said Fire Chief Gregg Cleveland.

In its 36-year history, the West Salem Fire Protection District has never charged businesses or individuals on a regular basis to have the fire department respond to a fire call.

However, board Secretary-Treasurer Merlin Wehrs said the district has been able to recoup the cost of water, foam and firefighter wages in some instances when property owners had insurance that covered the bill.

Since 1998, the district has sent out bills and been able to recoup costs in about six instances, the highest being about $1,950 and the lowest about $50, Wehrs said.

“My feeling on that is if I’m paying an insurance premium, my insurance covers expenses that are billed to property owners because of a fire, and I can’t use it because I don’t have a bill from the fire department,” Wehrs said. “I don’t see anything wrong with (billing for fire calls).”

But if a bill goes unpaid, the district can’t enforce collection because it does not have an official policy.

Wehrs said the department responds to 80 to 90 calls a year, although only five to 10 of those are fire-related, such as a structure, vehicle or grass fire. Wehrs estimates the department could recoup about $5,000 a year if the district begins charging for fire calls.

The state also reimburses the fire district up to $500 when firefighters are called to a vehicle fire on Interstate 90, Wehrs said.

Wehrs said those against creating a user fee have said people might hesitate to call the fire department for fear they’d be billed.

Either way, Oldenburg said he hopes it doesn’t come to that.

“We hope everything will come out in the end to get the money we need to keep them safe, so they can do their job,” he said.

To start charging for fire calls, each municipality the district covers — West Salem, and the towns of Barre and Hamilton — would have to approve the change.

In November 2005, the La Crosse Common Council approved a measure to charge non-city residents who had to be extricated from vehicles after crashes. Seven people since have been charged $265 each for extrication, Cleveland said.

La Crosse Tribune reporter Anne Jungen contributed to this story. Matthew Perenchio is assistant editor for the Coulee News.
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

DJ: wrote on May 11, 2008 9:09 PM:

" Another example of incompetent bloodsucking politicians at local, state and federal levels. We pay taxes for them to provide certain services and now thru their inefficient budgeting of our tax monies, they want to double bill us. Screw 'em. Quit electing boobs who happen to live next door and think before you go into the voting booth. "

justfillinin2 wrote on May 11, 2008 5:51 PM:

" One department fire chief I know from a neighboring department does not issue burning permits, but if you light it and it gets out of control, you will get a bill, vehicle accidents/fires are free, but structure fire bills go to the insurance companies. This program has worked for them for 30+ years, however our department doesn't charge. "

2Hoots wrote on May 11, 2008 2:38 PM:

" If there were no bills, the taxpayer is paying. If the municipality raises taxes to meet with the increasing costs of providing a service, the taxpayer is getting screwed. Just reviewing a few of the calls over the last 3 year period, I'd have to say that for most of the accidents we responded to, most (nearly all) were for people that were travelling through our area. Who should pay? Me the taxpayer? NOT! I agree that billing for calls brings up a lot of additional questions and 'what-ifs', but taxpayers should not be expected to foot the bill for all of the calls the FD responds to. Of the calls we went on for our taxpayers, many also still send us a donation even after they get a bill - and to my knowledge, no one has not called 911 because they couldn't afford it. "

HonestAbe wrote on May 11, 2008 2:17 PM:

" I don't care what analogies you throw at it, or how you try to spin it, it's a bad practice.

Of course your citizens are going to shrug and pay it if its enacted without a vote, what choice do they have.

As well, I bet when you send a bill, you don't say, oh, by the way, this is optional, only if your insurance covers it, if you don't have insurance, don't worry about it. betcha

Where is your dept? "

HonestAbe wrote on May 11, 2008 2:15 PM:

" marriage license is not covered in a tax bill that I've ever seen

It's listed as 'emergency services', not 'building to house emergency services'

double dipping plain and simple if you have to pay twice.

It's like going to culvers, ordering your food, paying, then when they bring it to the table, you have to pay AGAIN for the cup & paper that covers the food, and the washing of the table afterwards. No, you pay once, and everything falls under that payment. "

2Hoots wrote on May 11, 2008 1:07 PM:

" How is getting billed any different than paying for services already provided by the municipality where I live. If I go to the county courthouse and get a marriage license, I have to pay. Don't my taxes already contribute to having this county office? So why am I charged $80 for a piece of paper that I already paid for with my taxes. Am I not paying for the paper and it's processing twice? No, my taxes paid for the position/office to exist. When I actually need the service, I pay for the services I recieve. "

HonestAbe wrote on May 11, 2008 12:51 PM:

" 2Hoots, well, that's fine, so long as it isn't charged to a taxpaying resident I guess.

Otherwise, it would be double dipping and the wrong practice.

If local homeowners would be getting charged, that's just wrong, as they pay the taxes, so, to get your money you would go to the city. Otherwise, take the 'emergency services' out of the tax bill. (if there is a charge per call to a local resident) "

2Hoots wrote on May 11, 2008 12:30 PM:

" 3) For years, the fire departments have been the most underfunded portions of our local governments. Some municipalities pay more for their parks and ballfields than they contribute to their fire departments. "Just send out a mailer, have a bake sale, or some other fundraiser". WHY???? Does the highway department have a bake sale to buy a new road grader? NO! Who would go? Emergency services have fundraisers because people will contribute. (WE THANK THOSE THAT DO CONTRIBUTE). Always have and always will. Newsflash: Our donations, contributions, and even memorials are getting less and less every year. Have another bake sale? Do you realize how many hours volunteers put in for one bake sale just to keep expenses down?

Bill the $500, continue to hold fundraisers, and keep plugging along...

Thank your volunteer fire departments! "

2Hoots wrote on May 11, 2008 12:22 PM:

" 2) Who pays the FD for emergency responses to a church, school, or similar entity that does not pay taxes? We as taxpayers pick up the slack. Who pays for the car fire on the highway when the vehicle is from out of the area or out of state? We as taxpayers pick up the tab. Who pays for the unfounded calls the FD responds to? We as taxpayers pay for these hundreds of responses.

$500 isn't too much to charge for those that contribute nothing to our tax base. "

2Hoots wrote on May 11, 2008 12:16 PM:

" 1) I'm on a fire department that bills. The max amount is $500 that we charge for anything. If we are on scene for 30 minutes or 3 hours - the bill is not more than $500. Homeowners insurance companies don't even think twice about the FD bill. The ones I've talked to just expect to have to pay something. Your taxes pay for the departments to exist. The taxes once used to cover just about everything. Now there are more and more expenses just like everywhere else. Billing for calls isn't going to offset everything, but it can take some of the edge off. "

The Real Paladin wrote on May 11, 2008 10:21 AM:

" How is this plan working in other communities with FD's that bill? "

Citizen75 wrote on May 11, 2008 10:18 AM:

" I totally agree. I was taught that communities levie taxes to fund community based needs, e.g. schools, police, fire protection. Wow if they want to charge per call then why should anyone be asked to pay tax to support that organization? Personaly I would be realy pissed if I got charged for something I have already paid for. Someone needs to take a independant look at that department. Audit anyone??? "

HonestAbe wrote on May 11, 2008 10:07 AM:

" Now, tell me the economy is good and Bush is a good president. If you like this sort of thing, vote McCain ,,, I'm not saying any of them are 'good', but McCain is going to step right into GWs shoes.

Imagine your house just burns down, and you're staying at a shelter .... then you go to get mail and there's a bill from the fire dept! wow...wow "

HonestAbe wrote on May 11, 2008 10:07 AM:

" Mack, that was my first thought .... there's going to be someone out there that thinks, well, I'll save a little and try to do it myself. I'm a do it yourselfer, but you would think the fire department could get paid by taxes. It will inhibit some from calling ... and to make an insurance claim, insurance will go even higher than it is (plastic vehicle bumpers should be outlawed, thats a big contributor).

This is madness! www.costofwar.com

"

Mack wrote on May 11, 2008 8:48 AM:

" There are towns a lot smaller than West Salem that have no trouble supporting their own volunteer fire departments. I wonder why this community is having problems. Charging for calls might inhibit some from calling when they really need help. "

AlEv wrote on May 11, 2008 7:42 AM:

" Bill our insurance? Double taxation. Our taxes already go to pay services such as these. Mismanagement of local budgets already penalizes citizens, this would only hurt us even further. We currently enjoy the 2nd lowest auto insurance rates in the country (behind only Iowa). If insurers have to start paying these bills, they are bound to increase premiums. "

The Real Paladin wrote on May 11, 2008 7:30 AM:

" The department expects to gain $5000 a year? What's the price of a new truck? Pumper $200K? The department could make more than $5K by just sending out a mailing and soliciting a donation. "

TMK wrote on May 11, 2008 6:05 AM:

" Don't the village taxes pay for the fire department? I still remember when the schools paid for all needed school supplies but now the parents pay for all of them. What is the village doing with all the tax money taken from the citizens? Soon, no taxes people pay will cover anything for the people. It'll all go to the board, Mayor, village employees, unneeded objects, and inane projects that end up not working. This is beyond ridiculous. The board needs to overhaul their expenses so the fire department wont have to charge for putting out a fire. Didn't I read or hear somewhere that the new Mayor got his office redone and got a brand new fancy computer during his first year in office? The fire department wouldn't have to charge if they were put nearer the top of the list of needed business. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.